The board that grew

When a kanban board
stops being enough.

Nothing broke. The board still works exactly as it did on day one — that is the problem. Thirty cards was a plan. Three hundred is an archive nobody reads, and "what did we actually ship last month?" has no answer that does not involve scrolling.

14-day trial · £2.49 per seat per month · viewers are free

WHAT ACTUALLY BREAKS

Three failures,
all the same cause.

A board is a picture of right now. Once it also has to be the record of everything before now, it is doing two jobs and doing the second one badly.

  • The Done column becomes a landfill

    Everything finished piles up in one place, so the column that should be the most satisfying to look at is the one nobody opens. Archiving hides the work; leaving it makes the board unusable. Neither is a record.

  • Nothing carries forward on purpose

    Unfinished work stays where it is, mixed in with work that never started. The distinction between "we tried this and did not finish" and "we have never touched this" is the most useful one a team has, and a single long-lived board erases it.

  • Every status question needs a person

    What is in flight, how much arrived this week, which stage everything is stuck at — all of it is visible on the board and none of it is countable. So someone counts, by hand, on a Friday.

WHAT LAVER DOES

The board ends,
and says what it did.

Not a bigger board. A board with an end date, which is a different object entirely.

  • A sprint closes itself

    Turn a board into a repeating series — 7, 14 or 21 days, or anything from 1 to 90. When a sprint ends, Laver creates the next board with the same columns, groups and people, moves the unfinished tickets across, and leaves the finished ones behind.

    The board you just closed becomes an honest record of what that cycle delivered. Nobody writes it; it is what is left.

    Sprints
  • The new board starts as the remainder

    Not a fresh guess — the honest leftovers, already in the columns they were in. The difference between "unfinished" and "never started" survives, because only one of them moved.

    Boards and columns
  • The counting is done for you

    Every board has a stats view: how many tickets sit at each stage, including the stages nobody has reached, a breakdown by label, and how many arrived each week for the last twelve.

    Counts, not forecasts. There is no velocity model here and no burndown chart pretending to predict next month.

HONEST FIT

Where this helps,
and where it will not.

If a bigger board is genuinely what you need, Laver is the wrong answer and we would rather you knew now.

A good fit when

  • Work arrives continuously and you want a regular line drawn under it.
  • "What did we ship last cycle?" is a question somebody actually asks.
  • The team is roughly three to thirty people and nobody wants to administer a tool.

Not what this is

  • No swimlanes, no calendar and no timeline. Groups exist; they are filters, not a second dimension.
  • No velocity, burndown or cycle-time reporting — the stats view is counts.
  • No epics, custom fields, dependencies or automation rules.
  • Every sprint adds a board, so a long-running series grows the sidebar.

READY WHEN YOU ARE

Draw a line under it.

Turn one board into a cycle, and let the closed ones be the record you keep meaning to write.

Start your free trial

Keep reading